February 4, 2008

  • questions answered.

    first i should point out that it seems a number of subscribers still have an old link for this blog. you need to rid yourself of the old link and apply the new one for a much more aesthetically pleasing experience. if you cannot view the “chat” window then you are not viewing this in an appropriate manner.

    http://www.xanga.com/emprise34

    if this is the first you’ve heard or seen of the “chat’ window, then what follows will make very little sense. there is a tv/chat module on my blog page that you can submit questions to. a while back, the good people of emprisetv’s chat room suggested a system of answering the questions posted in the questions section, it being that i answer them here in a post. and so i shall. i think the way it is supposed to work is i’m supposed to choose the ones that have been voted for most and answer those, but that is sheer nonsense. there is no question too small, and so i will attempt to open the inner machinery of my mind for all who have shown curiosity. i will start toward the most recent and work my way through with no strict adherence to order.

    and so, let us begin:

    question number 1: “just curious, do you know if you guys are playing soulfest 2008 yet?”

    the answer to this one is simple. yes. we do know.

    question number 2: “is there ever a time when you feel that performing is just business as usual?”

    the answer to this one is less simple. the short and truthful answer is “no.” where it gets a tad complicated is when i attempt to enunciate the fact that we never feel like we are performing. where the word, “performing,” feels an improper description, i’d suggest a more accurate term might be, “facilitating.” we are using music to create an atmosphere, or environment, that brings an awareness of the reality we live in: the very presence of god. this, in my mind, can by no means ever become “business as usual.” it just seems an impossibility. as well, we just plain love music and the making of it together. add to this rooms of people singing along with us and it’s just pretty fantastic, to be perfectly forthcoming.

    question 3: “another world is possible?”

    this is perhaps the most complex question of the bunch. for one, if not for the slight bit of punctuation at the end, this could be a rather robust statement or admonition. but, with the addition of the interrogation point, i’ll assume the intent was in fact to interrogate. so, then i must decide if this is a statement of determinism vs freewill or perhaps senordiecast was inhaling mind altering substances when a transcendental moment presented itself with no one around to share it with. after much thought, i have decided that senordiecast does not smoke the johnson grass and was in fact presenting a theological and metaphysical dilemma. and so, i will answer with verve and reverence as i believe. yes, senordiecast, yes, another world is possible.

    question 4: “nite dcb. have a safe trip and sweet dreams. thanks for allowing us into your world. blessings, bongo :)

    this is not a question. however, it is a very kind statement and well appreciated as such.

    question 5: “what’s in the fridge?”

    (judging by the date of this question it was obviously asked in regards to the fridge on our bus. since i currently am not on the bus the answer that follows is completely fictious.)

    three shelves
    a light
    7 aluminum cans that contain diet coke
    8 aluminum cans that contain sprite
    a large number of bottled waters (i’m unsure about the pluralization of “water” here. of course, i could have typed, bottles of water, but instead went with the colloquial.)
    1 styrofoam carry out box with some brown, unidentifiable food stuffs that is pungent and enveloping.
    4 ketchup packets
    some grapes
    various cheeses
    a bag of lettuce
    mitt romney
    2 opened boxes of baking soda that are obviously losing the battle with the styrofoam-box-food-stuff’s aromas
    a fork (!?)
    3 dr peppers
    1 bottle of yellow mustard
    wait? mitt romney?
    seriously, it is just not possible that mitt romney is in our fridge. that would be ridiculous. and what kind of name is “mitt”?
    also, the patriots did not have a perfect season

    question 6: “i went to the show in cincinatti and there was alcohol being served. i was shocked that it was being served at a christian concert. can you tell me why it was being served?”

    yes. i’m pretty sure that the bar was selling alcohol because it is a bar and that’s what bars sell. they typically like to make money and so they buy things, such as beers, from a distributor for a certain price and then mark it up to sell to people so that they will get a profit and get to pay their employees and get to stay open and such. alcohol is usually a pretty big seller for bars. i am sorry this was shocking.

    i might add, both historically and currently, there are many people who love jesus, and follow him, that also enjoy alcohol regularly. if you have not encountered these people first hand, you should attempt to enlarge your peer circle and i think you’ll get a clearer picture of the diversity of the body of christ. there are denominations and traditions that denounce alcohol, and there are those that condone it. these beliefs are typically culturally specific and attached to a particular sect’s interpretations of a few particular passages in scripture. i should state here that we, as a band and as individuals, do not, in any way, condone drunkenness, as it is stupid, nor under-aged drinking as it is also stupid and against the law, and trust that those in attendance at various dates on our club tour are intelligent enough to arrive at both of these conclusions as well. it is not very difficult to observe the damaging effects of abusing alcohol. it is simple that way; abuse it, it abuses you back, most of the time immediately.

    (an aside: in my experience, most conversations about alcohol with those who adamantly reject it as a possible beverage choice, present that it could cause a brother to stumble. this is awful logic. apply this logic to various food items ordered at your next public meal. there will doubtlessly be present various numbers of people who struggle with obesity or high cholesterol or heart disease, who would really love one of your cheesesticks. there will also be those present who are vegetarian, myself included, who are attempting to not ingest meat. i’m sure you see the trouble with this line of thinking. this was the very argument that peter and paul were having regarding idol meat. i will not attempt further argument here since there is plenty to find out there, if one were truly curious, that would present things in a much more scholarly and organized manner than i could hope to present it. i will also state here that i shall not require you to cease your carnivorous ways while sharing a restaurant with me.)

    and finally, i should state the reasons we went on a tour that had as its venues bars and clubs exclusively. we wished for the story of god to be experienced beyond the safety of our cloistered church environments. it was our deep hope that many who would not frequent a bar would come join us and experience the reality of the presence of god in an environment that they might not typically suspect to experience such a thing in. we believe, if we are reading scripture correctly, that once the veil was torn, that in an instant, suddenly, god was everywhere. the symbolism and consequences of this moment are epic! the way human beings access the maker of heaven and earth were forever changed. suddenly, once and for all, through the ultimate sacrificial offering, suddenly, he is everywhere. every second is lived in the very presence of god. there is no moment that is not holy. there is no space that is not sacred. it is the awareness of our reality that shifts, not this reality. therefore, all that is needed is for our awareness to change and we begin to view spaces and people and cultures and music and art and eating and drinking and sleeping and waking as moments and spaces and places where god is already active and present. our hope on this tour was to give people a physical, tangible experience of this reality.

    question 7: “what’s your favorite guitar to doodle around with?”

    my olson.

    question 8: “i went to the manhattan ks concert and there was no alcohol being served. can you tell me why?”

    yes. because of question number 6.

    question 9: “what does emprise34’s profile picture mean?”

    self explanatory.

    question 10: “when are you coming back to austin?”

    i don’t know. i think i might go down there to eat at papasito’s on friday. i love me some salsa.

    question 11: “oh yeah, my husband is a music pastor, and he truly looks up to you guys. and i guess what i’m trying to say is… can he come over and play with ya’ll?”

    the short answer is, “i doubt it.” i have made a couple of assumptions here: one, that when you say, “play,” you intend the verb to indicate the making of music, and you do not intend it to denote your husband’s coming over for the engagement of imaginative pretense. second, i also have assumed by your usage of the colloquial, “ya’ll,” you live close enough to us for this -– his coming over – to be a real possibility, as in you don’t live in new york or calgary. and so with reluctance and careful thought i answered, “i doubt it.” here’s why: first of all, we never, ever, just sit around playing music. this is proven fact. we have only practiced as a band once and it didn’t go well. so we just don’t. and also, i too am on staff at a church and when i am in town i’m spending most of my time catching up with what i missed out on while away and trying to get stuff done for when i’m away next. ben, one of our community pastors at the chuch, is also a fantastic musician, a guitar player to be exact. ben is always wanting me to “play” with him and i never have the time. he always says, “hey dave, let’s jam.” (he doesn’t really use the word, “jam”. no one would use that word, ever. my use here and now being the exception, obviously.) “no, ben,” i say. “i’m sorry, but i cannot.” seriously, you can ask him. so, if there arises such an occasion to have someone come over and, “play,” unfortunately, ben has first dibs.

    question 12: “you may not know how to answer this, but i’m gonna ask anyway. how are you guys so stinkin’ cool?”

    magnets.

    question 13: “will we get to watch you guys play golf on this new tv contraption?”

    yes.

    question 14: “do you know the muffin man?”

    yes. and actually his name is robert. he prefers, “robert,” to, “muffin man.” just something to keep in mind.

    question 15: “my name is david. this is my blog. every time i try to answer a question it gets deleted! so my question is, how do i answer these questions without deleting them?”

    self explanatory.

    OK KIDS. THAT’S ALL FOR NOW. MORE TO COME AT A LATER TIME.

Comments (53)

  • good post there david.

  • thanks for talking the time to answer all these questions so throughly…

    you, mr. crowder, are in fact the man, the myth…the LEGEND

  • this made me laugh. and think. good combo.

  • love the fridge contents!

  • thanks for the update! you didnt answer any questions with a question of your own though. this might be an obscure movie reference?

  • i need to get me some magnets. 

  • HAAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAH you are one funny davidcrowder
    thank you so much for the last paragraph of question 6

  • so funny! I <3 dcb!! best band everr!

  • i love your explanation of how bars work.

  • yeah! finally got around to answering those things! I was wondering when the day would come around. well answered.

  • That’s so awesome you guys answered the questions. Thanks!

  • Best.
    Post.
    Ever.

  • ….a bit rude….the blog readers aren’t stupid

  • I find your mastery of english rhetoric profound in nature David.

  • fantastic.

    as a footnote to my question that was answered above, I propose you read this book… The Irresistible Revolution by Shane Claiborne, or any number of other political and social revolutionaries.

    perhaps then my pseudo-postulation will make a bit more sense.

  • oh, and, Dave (no comma here). I really enjoy your responses. Thanks for nailing continually nailing it.

  • AMEN to the alcohol discussion!  WooHoo, I love you, David Crowder Band.

  • So I’m with everybody else when they say this blog was fantastic. If I knew you I’m sure we’d be good friends.

  • Coolio Iglesias

  • papasito’s rocks i must agree. went there christmas eve actually. oh and thanks, i’ve always wanted to know what was in your fridge. 

  • LOVE your answer to question 6!

  • Beautiful. I was already smiling today, so it’s kinda smile + funny = smilefunny.

    I fully agree with your answer to question six (well, I agree with all your answers, but… yeah…). I don’t drink myself–I’m underaged, but I can’t stand the smell of beer, etc. Still, I’ve seen and heard of mature Christians who drink in moderation. Unfortunately, many look down on these people.

    I should get back on the tv chat thing of awesomeness soon… I remember the first day or so ya’ll got it, and then later, when we watched the entire concert from B Whack’s head. Good times… although I became decidedly ADD, and kept forgetting about schoolwork and watched your bus drive down the road…

    Anyway, good post.

  • A Texan vegetarian, a rare and certainly fine specimen you are. As only a Californian vegetarian, I look up to you, sir.

  • that musta took a lot of time. thanks

  • If you are in fact vegetarian, why so much talk about BBQ, and Your food choice on your portion of the dcb website????

  • haha! thanks for your time here dave. =]

    so… why are you vegetarian? (i’ve considered it myself, but never gone for it)

  • Nice alcohol answer, sir.  I’m sorry that the question was even asked…

  • hee hee thank you for this post David.  =]  and thank you for facilitating the worship at Passion in Los Angeles.  it was an amazing experience for me and it’s awesome you were a part of everything God was doing in LA that weekend.  =]

  • good thoughts.

    per the alcohol, i suppose a lot of the logic that i have used in my personal convictions about alcohol is that it tends to define me as more of a “worldly” person than it does as a “Godly” person… like it or not, a lot of times, when we see a beer or something in someone’s hand.. we automatically assoicate that with “drunk college students getting wild”…

    while that is true in a lot of cases, i know it’s not in others.

    my personal desire and prayer has been that I want God to be pleased with me, above all things…and so whatever i need to do (or not do) in order to gain the smile of God on what i do, i want to pursue wholeheartedly.

  • great job! (thumbs up)

  • that was quite an extensive Q & A session. thanks for sharing.

  • I was SO confused!  I was going through my blog subscriptions and saw Xanga and thought is was from a lady that runs a children’s home in Haiti.  The questions and answers were very confusing until I got to the “golf” one.  THEN it all started to make sense (sort of).  You should post more often – then maybe I would be used to reading blogs of the lives of rock stars and not get you confused with people in Haiti!  Yes, my confusion is all your fault.

  • your posts are always fun to read, but I laughed REALLY hard at the reference to Mitt Romney in the fridge

    you sir, make my world(at least the online part) a slightly brighter place to be)

    keep up the excellent work, and Happy February!

  • Another World is Possible is good people.
    Diagram THAT sentence!

  • I don’t have a xanga, but after the LA Passion conference, I’ve been reading your blogs. We need more bands like yours. I loved how you said your band “facilitates” and not necessarily performs. That’s awesome. Anyways, this is a very long comment so I shall let you go. Thanks for taking your time to even answer those questions and approach us on a more personal level. By the way, your writing is very entertaining and beautiful! Have a good one! God Bless!

  • sweet sweet clarity

  • i appreciate your willingness to respond to your fans.  you’re a great example to young people and your character shows through even answers to questions on a weblog.  i pray that your ministry reaches beyond what man can imagine.

    keep up the good (God) work!

  • Nice.  While I disagree with some of your views, it’s very awesome for you to take time and share them.  =)

  • I’ve been wondering where Mitt Romney stood with respect to other refrigerator contents, and of course his proximity to the yellow mustard explains a lot.

  • hello, mr. crowder. can you please expand the logic behind your response on question 6? I’m having trouble understanding how not wanting to be a stumbling block to your brother can be awful logic. just want to find where i stand in matters like this. thanks!!! btw**i’m really feeling the remix of Rain.

  • Dave- How are ya?  To the point.  Are there plans for a live DVD/CD for this year?  The God of the this City cd is excellent.  Be good.-Mike.

  • Dave- How are ya?  To the point.  Are there plans for a live DVD/CD this year.  The God Of This City CD is excellent.-Mike.

  • Would you answer my question?

  • are you sure the smell in the fridge was coming from the styrofoam take-out container and not mitt romney?

    and the whole alcohol thing: i detest mayonnaise. but i don’t think i’ve ever thought about asking someone to abstain from applying it to their sandwiches because of my own disdain for it. how would that conversation even go?

    “oh, i’m sorry. you’re going to have to choose another condiment for your sandwich. i’m sorry, but i really believe mayonnaise is of the devil. i mean, come on! hellman’s? it’s very obvious.”

  • Funny that Mitt was in the fridge, I kind of expected him to be an “oven” Mitt.  Thanks for answering my totally absurd question.  

  • i read this comic online, and this one made me think of you…i think you’ll like it.  :)

  • green bullhorns = weak arcade fire rip-off

  • Woah… skookumtumtum20  just commented like the great David Crowder would… That was good… You should write books….

    And yeah… Crowder… You need to come to Canada… EH?

  • While some of you may laugh at the response given to question #6, it is not biblically nor Spiritually supported. Rather than trying to support the view of Christians drinking in moderation using scripture, only opinion and man’s logic is used. This is very dangerous, as man is certainly not the final authority concerning these things. I will post scripture to aid anyone else who may read this blog. The truth is in the scriptures; do not allow this blog to give you the green light to drink. There is one lawgiver and one Judge (James 4:12), obey His Words.

    We are to be sober (

    2
    Cor 5:13

    ; 1 Thess. 5:6-8,

    1 Tim 3:2

    ;

    Titus 1:8

    ;

    Titus 2:2,4,6,12

    ; 1 Peter 1:13;

    1 Peter 4:7

    ). “Be sober, be vigilant; because your adversary the devil, as a roaring lion, walketh about, seeking whom he may devour: (1 Peter 5:8)”. Studies show that even one drink can impair our thinking and judgment. (http://alcoholism.about.com/library/weekly/aa021109a.htm)

    Abstain from the appearance of evil: “Prove all things; hold fast that which is good. Abstain from all appearance of evil” (1 Thess. 5:21-22).

    Abstain from anything that would make a brother sin or stumble themselves. What if by your drinking another younger Christian decides its okay to drink? What if they cannot drink in “moderation”? (Drinking can not only harm your body but also those around you (1 Corinthians 6:19)). “It is good neither to eat flesh, nor to drink wine, nor any thing
    whereby thy brother stumbleth, or is offended, or is made weak” (Romans 1:21).

    Is it not your flesh that drives you to drink? “Dearly beloved, I beseech you as strangers and pilgrims, abstain from fleshly lusts, which war against the soul;” (1 Pet. 2:11)

    “Wine is a mocker, strong drink is raging: and whosoever is deceived thereby is not wise” (Pro. 20:1).

    (

    Proverbs 23:29-32, Isaiah 28:7-8, Galatians 5:19-21)

    Resource (http://www.housetohouse.com/hth/biblequestions/archive/question0029.htm)

    In Jesus,
    Daniel
    (1 Corinthians 6:9-10)

  • Daniel all I can say is that your exposition of scripture is neither supported by scripture itself when read in the original language and context, or by historical fact.  Christians have enjoyed alcoholic beverages since Christ himself walked the Earth.  Remember that Christ’s first miracle was turning water into wine and Christ himself drank wine on numerous occasions, most notably the last supper.  While we know that drinking small amounts of alcohol can cause some physiological impairment (albeit minimal) this was not known to the writer’s of the Bible or those to whom the Bible was originally written.  Thus when the Bible refers to drunken vs. sober these terms must be understood in the context of the 1st century near east and when read in this context the general criteria would be visible drunkenness (sorry they didn’t have Breathalyzer’s) which is in most cases is actually higher then the legal limit for driving while intoxicated.  

    As to the appearance of evil argument the Bible also condemns gluttony.  Does this mean that occasionally grabbing your favorite fast food should be condemned??  I mean if one ate fast food in large quantities they would be gluttonous and therefore evil.  By your logic then eating a small amount of it would be the appearance of evil.  Heck even eating food at all could be seen as the appearance of evil.  I hope you see the absurdity of your argument.  There are numerous things that are permissible for Christians to partake in, but become sinful when they are not done in moderation or the right context.  Your argument would forbid numerous things which are not only permissible but beneficial when done in moderation. 

    I also add that in most of the verses you list the Greek word “Nepho” is the word translated as “sober”.  In this context it has nothing to do with drunkenness at all.  Rather it means to be “calm and collected in spirit”, or “to be temperate, dispassionate, circumspect”.   The other word used is “Sophroneo” or some derivation of it which means “to exercise self control” or “to curb one’s passions.  Both of these words are describing a persons demeanor rather then their state of intoxication.  At the very least check your interpretations with a good lexicon before you go spouting off Bible versus to prove a point please. 

  • As a historical aside the Pilgrim’s who were Puritan’s fleeing persecution from the Church of England (they wanted it to be more Protestant and less Catholic in nature) landed at Plymouth Rock rather than continuing further south among other reasons because they had run out of beer.  I don’t hope to prove anything with this – just a fun fact.  

Post a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *